This website uses cookies to store information on your computer. Some of these cookies are used for visitor analysis, others are essential to making our site function properly and improve the user experience. By using this site, you consent to the placement of these cookies. Click Accept to consent and dismiss this message or Deny to leave this website. Read our Privacy Statement for more.
Print Page   |   Sign In   |   Register
Literature CfPs for RSA 2019 Toronto
Blog Home All Blogs
This blog is for CfPs for sessions in literature for RSA 2019 Toronto. Members may post CfPs here: sign in to RSA and select "add new post" to do so. Your post should include a title, and the CfP itself should be no longer than 250 words. Adding tags (key words) to your post will help others find your CfP. Make sure the CfP includes the organizer's name, email address or mail-to link for email address, and a deadline for proposals. Non-members may email rsa@rsa.org to post a CfP. Please use the email address of the session organizer posted in the CfP to submit a paper proposal. CfPs are posted in order of receipt, with the newest postings appearing at the top of the blog. Members may subscribe to the blog to be notified when new CfPs are posted: click on the word Subscribe next to the green checkmark above.

 

Search all posts for:   

 

Top tags: Literature  early modern  gender  book history  Poetry  material culture  print culture  Renaissance literature  drama  Iberian Peninsula  identity  women  epic poetry  history of reading  printers  reception history  religion  archival research  art history  catholic reform  classical literature  classical reception  colonial Latin America  cultural history  devotional  digital humanities  history of the book  interdisciplinary  Italian literature  Italy 

Printing, Reception, Editing, and Teaching Thomas More and Early Humanists

Posted By Emily A. Ransom, Tuesday, July 24, 2018

The Amici Thomae Mori is excited to welcome proposals for papers on Thomas More studies to coincide with the publication of the new Essential Works of Thomas More (Yale University Press, 2019).  This single-volume, accessible, readable edition will be the third major collection of More’s works in nearly five hundred years, after the 1557 Workes published by More’s nephew William Rastell and the Yale Complete Works in fifteen volumes completed in 1997. Though papers on all areas of Thomas More studies will be considered, the Amici is especially interested in topics that will complement this important publication, such as print history of humanist texts, reception history of Thomas More and early humanists, editing humanist texts, and teaching humanist texts in the modern classroom.

To submit a paper, please send your title (15-word max), abstract (150-word max), a few keywords, CV, PhD completion date (past or expected), and affiliation to Emily Ransom (ransome@uwgb.edu) by August 10, 2018.  

Tags:  archival research  archives  book history  catholic reform  circulation  devotion  devotional  editing  hagiographical  history of the book  manuscript  Manuscript Culture  networks  pedagogy  print culture  printers  readers  Reception  reception history  transmission  women; hagiography 

PermalinkComments (0)
 

"Poco sufficienti a poterli intendere": Auto-Commentary and Self-Exegesis in Early Modern Italy

Posted By Francesco Marco Aresu, Monday, July 2, 2018
Updated: Monday, July 2, 2018

This session aims to prompt critical reflection on early-modern forms of auto-commentary and self-exegesis as they appear in Italian literature in various textual and material forms. Ranging from Dante’s foundational experiments in authorial (and authoritative) hermeneutics to Lorenzo’s Comento de’ miei sonetti, these forms include extended commentaries accompanying the text (Dante’s quasi comento in the Convivio), marginal and interlinear glosses (Petrarca’s annotations to his drafts, Boccaccio’s edition of the Teseida), forewords, and afterwords, as well as connective sections that discuss the work of which they are a paratext (Boccaccio’s poetics discourse in the framework of the Decameron), and autonomous texts materially appended to the work they comment on or circulating separately (Dante’s disputed epistle to Can Grande). Furthermore, self-exegetical practices may vary in pragmatics: they can provide a genetic narrative or re-semantization of texts (Dante’s ragioni in the Vita Nova), offer an allegorical interpretation (Dante’s divisioni), clarify obscure passages (Campanella’s apparatus to his poetic anthology), engage in literary polemics, or extend apologetic or palinodic remarks (Tasso’s Lettere on the poetics of his works). Above all, these such auto-commentative practices represent the authors’ attempt to condition the reception of their work beyond their own Barthesian death. In this session, we look at the auto-commentary as an intersection of physical, rhetorical, and intellectual elements. We solicit philological and hermeneutical inquiries, and welcome theoretical and historical approaches as well as projects that are comparative and multilingual.

 

Please send title, abstract, and bio to Beatrice Arduini (barduini@uw.edu) or Francesco Marco Aresu (faresu@wesleyan.edu) by 07/31.

Tags:  Authoriality  Authorship  Auto-Commentary  Boccaccio  Dante  Exegesis  Hermeneutics  Italian Literature  Italian Renaissance  Literary Criticism  Lorenzo de' Medici  Manuscript Culture  Materiality  Paratext  Petrarch  Philology  Poetics  Poetry  Reception  Tasso 

PermalinkComments (0)
 
Membership Software Powered by YourMembership  ::  Legal